AFTER DARK, MY SWEET (1990)

D: James Foley. P: Robert Redlin, Ric Kidney. W: Robert Redlin, James Foley. Ph: Mark Plummer. M: Maurice Jarre. St: Jason Patric (Kevin ‘Kid’ Collins, known as Collie), Rachel Ward (Fay Anderson), Bruce Dern (Garrett ‘Uncle Bud’ Stoker), George Dickerson (Doctor Goldman), Rocky Giordani (Bert)


“I just had to keep going. I had to have the end come”

Grounded in honest, nuanced portrayals of misfits and losers, Foley’s updating of a Jim Thompson novel is a haunting evocation of timeless noir themes. Utilising flashbacks and voiceover, it transmits a familiar sense of entrapment, psychological and physical, which contrasts effectively with the empty, open highway that offers the protagonist an escape route he never takes – until too late.

The script retains the tang of Thompson’s dialogue and the sourness of his worldview; hopelessness clings to the characters like sweat. The chief conduit is Patric’s transient, punch-drunk ex-boxer, a noir archetype who once beat an opponent to death, and whose mental health is as unstable as his temper. “A man in your condition is easily influenced,” says the doctor who takes an (implicitly homoerotic) interest in him. “You can see the potential for tragedy.”


Shambling, spaced-out appearance to the contrary, Collie does indeed intuit the danger he courts when he accepts a ride and a job from Rachel Ward’s alcoholic widow, and subsequently a pivotal role in a half-cocked kidnap scheme cooked up by the shifty Uncle Bud (a superb turn from Dern, who looked back on this role as a mid-career resurrection). Yet Collie rejects the doctor’s advice, as well as his offer of refuge, and stays with Amy, compelled by something beyond mere desire. In classic noir style, it is a force he can neither entirely comprehend nor control: “I couldn’t walk away... It just seemed like something I had to do, like I’d been set in a rut and had to follow it out to the end.”


Collie wrong-foots his new companions much like pretty-boy Patric – who is captivating, thoroughly absorbed in his role – may have surprised the few filmgoers who saw this muted drama at the cinema. Anticipating a double cross – indeed, he plants the seed in Bud’s brain – Collie is no patsy. Patric, channelling the Method, plays him with a boxer’s stance, guard up, his violent mood swings keeping the others off theirs. This is a chamber piece full of discord. Reciprocal mistrust hangs in the air and occasionally flares; nuances of character are a combustible brew, especially when debate turns to the fate of the boy they have abducted – the scion of a wealthy local family who, it transpires, has diabetes.


While the plot mechanics are obvious – almost by default, criminal endeavours in noir end in failure – the interaction of the characters, and their realisation by the actors, makes After Dark an uncomfortably intimate experience. Bud, who claims to be an ex-detective, affects an easy-going, trust-me manner that masks the desperation (and ineptitude) of a man who has crossed the wrong people and needs this deal to pay off. Amy, theoretically a femme fatale, comes out swinging with cynical retorts, but is not as tough as she appears. Mentally scarred by marriage to a bad egg, living in limbo among neglected date palms (remnants of a get-rich-quick wheeze), she salves her wounds with liquor. This also blurs her judgment, hence her involvement with Bud and, in a different sense, with Collie. Their love-hate dynamic acquires a dangerous edge when Collie accuses her of harmful intentions towards the boy. (The scenes with the youngster, incidentally, are directed with restraint and sensitivity.)


The year of the film’s release was a significant one for neo-noir, and for Thompson adaptations in particular. It is superior to The Kill-Off and more than holds its own against the Oscar-nominated The Grifters. Set on the edge of the California desert, there is a kind of sickly amber glow to the images that magnifies the hothouse intensity of the drama – not so much the sputtering romance of Collie and Fay; more the tension among the principals as a group.

The denouement finds Collie once again confounding expectations, trying to make the most of a bad deal, not for himself – a true noir anti-hero, he has accepted the inevitable – but for Fay: “When a man stops caring what happens to him, all the strain is lifted from him… and he can see people exactly as they are.” In Thompson’s world there was scant opportunity for heroism; in Foley’s retelling, Collie’s final act provides at least an approximation. Kevin Grant


No comments:

Post a Comment